<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PPACA Archives Page - GSA National</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gsanational.com/category/ppaca/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gsanational.com/category/ppaca/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2020 22:03:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Guidance For Employer Shared Responsibility Payments Announced</title>
		<link>https://www.gsanational.com/guidance-employer-shared-responsibility-payments-announced/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gsanational.com/guidance-employer-shared-responsibility-payments-announced/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wpengine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 16:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Contact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Play or Pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gsanational.com/?p=1099</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The IRS has announced new guidance regarding the Employer Shared Responsibility Payments (the &#8220;ESRPs&#8221;), which are the ACA penalties assessable to “Applicable Large Employers” for failing to provide affordable health...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/guidance-employer-shared-responsibility-payments-announced/">Guidance For Employer Shared Responsibility Payments Announced</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gsanational.com">GSA National</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><script src="//platform.linkedin.com/in.js" type="text/javascript"></script><br />
<script type="IN/Share"></script> The IRS has announced new guidance regarding the Employer Shared Responsibility Payments (the &#8220;ESRPs&#8221;), which are the ACA penalties assessable to “Applicable Large Employers” for failing to provide affordable health care coverage to eligible full-time employees.<br />
Although the IRS began collecting information from employers (via the <a href="https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1095c.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Form 1095-C</a>), beginning with the 2015 calendar year, it has not yet assessed any of the ESRP &#8220;play-or-pay&#8221; penalties.  The new guidance forewarns that the IRS is gearing up for the penalty collection program. The guidance states that notices for penalties pertaining to 2015 will begin being issued in &#8220;late 2017.&#8221;<br />
The IRS has also released a sample of the penalty notice (<a href="https://www.irs.gov/pub/notices/ltr226j.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Letter 226J</a>). The letter gives notice of a tentative penalty assessment for each non-exempt full-time employee who received a premium tax credit for health insurance coverage purchased on a state or federal Marketplace exchange.<br />
Because of the complexity of the Form 1095-C program, it is expected that the IRS&#8217;s records are not entirely accurate. Consequently, we should assume that a notice will be sent to most employers, with the odds increased for larger employers.<br />
Unfortunately, the deadline for responding to the IRS challenging its report is very short. Specifically, the appeal must be submitted within 30 days of the date of the penalty notice, and not 30 days from the receipt of the letter. The response date will be printed on the letter.<br />
Because the timeframe for challenging the IRS&#8217;s tentative penalty assessment is very short, employers may wish to prepare for the inevitable receipt of the notice.  Actions that they should consider taking are outlined below.</p>
<ol>
<li>Identify to whom the notice will be sent, and alert that person or office to be on the lookout for the notice. Presumably, but not necessarily, it will be sent to the contact person listed in Part 1 of the Form 1094-C transmittal form.</li>
<li>Have copies of the 2015 Form 1095-Cs available to compare with the listings that will be included with the Letter 226J penalty notice.</li>
<li>Alert their Form 1095 vendor that you may need supporting information and reports on a quick turnaround basis.</li>
<li>Assemble a team to review and respond to the notice.</li>
</ol>
<p>The sample penalty notice letter released by the IRS makes mention of the form to be used in challenging the penalty (Form 14764).  A copy of that specific form has not yet been released. We will post a link to Form 14764 upon its release.<br />
If you have questions about the new guidance, contact us at <a href="mailto:solutions@gsanational.com">solutions@gsanational.com</a> or <strong>1-800-250-2741 ext. 170</strong>.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/guidance-employer-shared-responsibility-payments-announced/">Guidance For Employer Shared Responsibility Payments Announced</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gsanational.com">GSA National</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gsanational.com/guidance-employer-shared-responsibility-payments-announced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 2017 Comparative Effectiveness Research Fee</title>
		<link>https://www.gsanational.com/2017-cerf/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gsanational.com/2017-cerf/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wpengine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 19:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCORI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gsanational.com/?p=972</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>It’s that time of year again. The Affordable Care Act imposes an annual fee called the Comparative Effectiveness Research Fee (CERF) on insurers and plan sponsors of self-insured coverage to...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/2017-cerf/">The 2017 Comparative Effectiveness Research Fee</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gsanational.com">GSA National</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s that time of year again.<br />
The Affordable Care Act imposes an annual fee called the Comparative Effectiveness Research Fee (CERF) on insurers and plan sponsors of self-insured coverage to help fund the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. The fee is based on the average covered lives for the applicable plan year.<br />
<strong>IRS Notice 2016-64</strong>, issued on Nov. 4, provides that the PCORI fee for plan years ending on or after Oct. 1, 2016, and before Oct. 1, 2017, including 2016 calendar year plans, is $2.26 per each person covered, up from $2.17 for the previous plan year.<br />
<strong>Paying PCORI Fees</strong><br />
For self-funded plans, the self-insured employer/plan sponsor is responsible for submitting the fee and accompanying paperwork to the IRS. Third-party reporting and payment of the fee is not permitted for self-funded plans.<br />
Employers subject to the fee must submit it by July 31 of the year following the last day of the plan year. For the coming year, self-insured health plan sponsors should use Form 720 for the second calendar quarter to report and pay the PCORI fee by July 31, 2017.<br />
Links:<br />
•	<a href="https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f720.pdf">IRS Form 720</a><br />
•	<a href="https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i720.pdf">IRS Form 720 Instructions</a><br />
If you have questions regarding the PCORI fees, call <strong>1.800.250.2741</strong> or email us at <a href="mailto: solutions@gsanational.com">solutions@gsanational.com</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/2017-cerf/">The 2017 Comparative Effectiveness Research Fee</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gsanational.com">GSA National</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gsanational.com/2017-cerf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Affordable Care Act Repeal and Replacement Bills: What Could it Mean for ‎Employers and Employees?‎</title>
		<link>https://www.gsanational.com/affordable-care-act-repeal-replacement-bills-mean-%e2%80%8eemployers-employees%e2%80%8e/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gsanational.com/affordable-care-act-repeal-replacement-bills-mean-%e2%80%8eemployers-employees%e2%80%8e/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wpengine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 19:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gsanational.com/?p=933</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On March 6, 2017, House Republicans introduced two coordinated bills to the Ways and Means Committee and the Energy and Commerce Committee designed to repeal and replace the Affordable Care...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/affordable-care-act-repeal-replacement-bills-mean-%e2%80%8eemployers-employees%e2%80%8e/">Affordable Care Act Repeal and Replacement Bills: What Could it Mean for ‎Employers and Employees?‎</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gsanational.com">GSA National</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On March 6, 2017, House Republicans introduced two coordinated bills to the Ways and Means Committee and the Energy and Commerce Committee designed to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”). The bills are collectively referred to as the “American Health Care Act” (which will be referred to hereafter as the “Proposed Legislation”).  The Ways and Means Committee bill is directed toward the tax provisions of the ACA, whereas the Energy and Commerce Committee bill pertains primarily to Medicaid matters.  On March 9, 2017, both committees approved the legislation along party-line votes.  The joint measure now proceeds to the House Budget Committee for consideration before a final House vote, which is expected later this month.  If the legislation passes the House, it will be sent to the Senate for a vote.<br />
The Proposed Legislation is a measure that nobody seems to like. Many influential groups, such as the American Medical Association, the American Nurses Association, the American Hospital Association and the AARP, oppose the Proposed Legislation.  On the other side of the spectrum, a number of conservatives have strongly expressed their view that the Proposed Legislation leaves too many entitlements, referring to the measure as “Obamacare-Lite.”  In the middle is President Trump, who promised during the campaign to swiftly repeal and replace the ACA.<br />
So much opposition seems to suggest that the measure will not be enacted. On the other hand, legislation that nobody likes often becomes law.  Consequently, we should be prepared for at least some of the proposals to be enacted.<br />
Against that background, below are key aspects of the Proposed Legislation that will be of interest to employers, and to their employees.<br />
<strong>1. Protected ACA Provisions</strong><br />
The Proposed Legislation does not eliminate all of the provisions of the ACA because it can’t. Republicans only have 52 members in the Senate, and so do not have the 60 votes needed to override a filibuster against any action to fully repeal the law.  The particulars of the Proposed Legislation are thus limited to those dealing with tax and spending issues, which can be enacted via a budget reconciliation process with a simple majority of the Senate.<br />
The provisions of the ACA saved from repeal include those pertaining to the following:<br />
The coverage of preexisting conditions;<br />
The coverage of adult children up through age 26;<br />
The maximum 90-day waiting periods;<br />
The limits on annual out-of-pocket expenditures on essential health benefits;<br />
The prohibitions on lifetime and annual limits;<br />
Required first-dollar coverage of preventive health services;<br />
The uniform coverage of emergency room services for in-network and out-of-network visits; and<br />
The external review of claims.<br />
<strong>2. Individual and Employer Mandates</strong><br />
The ACA requires most individuals to purchase health insurance or pay a penalty tax. The law similarly requires larger employers to offer affordable health insurance coverage to eligible full-time employees or potentially pay a penalty.<br />
These insurance mandates cannot be repealed outright under the simple majority budget reconciliation process. However, the tax aspects of the mandates can be stricken.  Accordingly, the Proposed Legislation provides for the reduction of the penalties to $0, effectively repealing the mandates.<br />
The repeal of the penalty would apply for months beginning after December 31, 2015, thereby providing retroactive relief to those impacted by the penalty in 2016.<br />
Comment: Effective for plan years beginning on and after January 1, 2014, the employer mandate required the offering of coverage to eligible full-time employees, which was defined as employees averaging more than 30 hours of service per week.  Previously, many employers required a greater number of worked hours for benefit eligibility purposes, such as those regularly working 35 or 40 hours per week.  If the ACA employer mandate penalty is eliminated, employers will be able to revisit their eligibility hours of service standards, and, if appropriate, reinstate practices that were in effect before 2014.<br />
<strong>3. Modifications to Premium Tax Credit Rules</strong><br />
Key features of the Proposed Legislation are those pertaining to the premium tax credit available to lower-income individuals who are not offered affordable coverage under an employer plan, and who purchase a policy on the Marketplace Exchange.<br />
Under the Proposed Legislation, the premium tax credit is repealed, beginning in 2020.<br />
For years through 2019, the following new rules will apply:<br />
Premium tax credits will continue to be available for insurance policies purchased under the Marketplace Exchange. However, the credits will also be available for the purchase of “catastrophic-only” qualified health plans, and for certain qualified plans    not offered through a Marketplace Exchange.<br />
Premium tax credits will not be available to purchase a policy that offers elective abortion coverage.<br />
<strong>4. New Refundable Tax Credit for Health Insurance</strong><br />
Controversial provisions of the Proposed Legislation are those that create a refundable tax credit for the purchase of state-approved, major medical health insurance and unsubsidized COBRA coverage.<br />
To be eligible for the refundable tax credit, an individual:<br />
Must not have access to government health insurance programs or an offer of insurance from any employer;<br />
Must be a citizen, national or qualified alien of the United States; and<br />
Must not be incarcerated.<br />
The amount of the annual tax credit is based on age:</p>
<ul>
<strong>Under age 30: $2,000<br />
Between 30 and 39: $2,500<br />
Between 40 and 49: $3,000<br />
Between 50 and 59: $3,500<br />
Over age 60: $4,000</strong></ul>
<p>The credit is available for each person. The credits are additive for a family, but capped at $14,000.  The credits will be adjusted for inflation.<br />
The tax credits are available in full to those making $75,000 per year ($150,000 joint filers). The credit phases out by $100 for every $1,000 in income higher than those thresholds.<br />
<strong>5. Late Enrollment Insurance Surcharge</strong><br />
In lieu of the individual insurance mandate is a continuous coverage incentive of the Proposed Legislation that is designed to limit adverse selection in health care markets. Under this provision, if, during the 12-month period preceding the enrollment in new insurance, an applicant had a lapse in coverage for greater than 63 consecutive days, then the insurer may assess a flat 30 percent late-enrollment surcharge on top of the base premium.<br />
In the case of an individual who ceased to be eligible for dependent coverage because of age, the surcharge will apply if the individual does not apply for coverage during the first open enrollment period following the date of the termination of coverage.<br />
The late-enrollment surcharge may be assessed for 12 months.<br />
The late-enrollment insurance surcharge will apply to special enrollments occurring during the plan year 2018, and for open enrollments occurring on and after January 1, 2019.<br />
<strong>6. Delay (But Not Yet the Full Repeal) of the Cadillac Tax</strong><br />
The ACA imposed a 40 percent excise tax on high-cost, employer-sponsored health coverage, known as the “Cadillac Tax.” The Cadillac Tax is scheduled to go into effect in 2020.<br />
The Proposed Legislation changes the effective date of the tax. Specifically, the tax will not apply until plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2025 (unless, of course, it is fully repealed before then).<br />
<strong>7. Repeal of Other ACA-Imposed Taxes and Restrictions</strong><br />
The Proposed Legislation would eliminate a number of taxes created by the ACA, effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. The taxes slated to be repealed include those mentioned below:<br />
OTC Drug Cost Reimbursements. Under current law, over-the-counter medications cannot be reimbursed under FSAs, HRAs, or other tax-advantaged health savings accounts.  The Proposed Legislation provides for the removal of this prohibition.<br />
Repeal of Limitations on Contributions to FSAs. The ACA limits the amount an individual may contribute to a health FSA ($2,600 for 2017).  The Proposed Legislation removes the limit (although an employer, through plan design, may impose its own).<br />
Increased HSA Contribution Limit. The Proposed Legislation increases the basic limit on aggregate HSA contributions for a year to equal the maximum on the sum of the annual deductible and out-of-pocket expenses permitted under a high deductible health plan.  Thus, the basic limit will be at least $6,550 in the case of self-only coverage and $13,100 in the case of family coverage, beginning in 2018.<br />
Repeal of Net Investment Tax and Medicare Tax. The ACA imposes a net investment tax, applying a rate of 3.8 percent to certain net investment income of individuals, estates, and trusts with income above certain amounts.  It also imposes a Medicare Hospital Insurance (“HI”) surtax based on income at a rate equal to 0.9 percent of a highly compensated employee’s wages or a self-employed individual’s income.  Both taxes will be eliminated.<br />
<center>*        *        *</center><br />
It is expected that the Proposed Legislation will be modified as it works its way through the legislative process. We will continue to monitor the legislation for further developments.</p>
<div style="background-color: #e2e9fd; width: 95%; padding: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; text-align: left;">This article was written by <a href="http://www.schwabe.com/showattorney.aspx?Show=11934" target="_new" rel="noopener noreferrer">Walter W. Miller</a>. Walter helps employers to comply with the myriad of laws governing retirement plans and other employee benefit programs. A primary focus of Mr. Miller&#8217;s current practice is the Affordable Care Act, including the employer &#8220;play-or-pay&#8221; mandates. He works with clients to evaluate the effect of the new law on their group health plans, and offers advice as to the manner of addressing the new rules. He is listed both in The Best Lawyers in America and SuperLawyers as being among the top attorneys in the field of employee benefits. He has also been elected as a Fellow of the American College of Employee Benefits Counsel, which is regarded as the preeminent professional association for employee benefits attorneys.</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/affordable-care-act-repeal-replacement-bills-mean-%e2%80%8eemployers-employees%e2%80%8e/">Affordable Care Act Repeal and Replacement Bills: What Could it Mean for ‎Employers and Employees?‎</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gsanational.com">GSA National</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gsanational.com/affordable-care-act-repeal-replacement-bills-mean-%e2%80%8eemployers-employees%e2%80%8e/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employers Urged To Continue ACA Compliance Efforts</title>
		<link>https://www.gsanational.com/employers-urged-continue-aca-compliance-efforts/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gsanational.com/employers-urged-continue-aca-compliance-efforts/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wpengine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 21:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCA Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Contract Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gsanational.com/?p=879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>January came and went, as&#160;did the January 27 budget resolution deadline for a report on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) reconciliation. Highlighted by the missed target date is the need...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/employers-urged-continue-aca-compliance-efforts/">Employers Urged To Continue ACA Compliance Efforts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gsanational.com">GSA National</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>January came and went, as&nbsp;did the January 27 budget resolution deadline for a report on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) reconciliation. Highlighted by the missed target date is the need for employers to continue compliance efforts until Congressional leadership can materialize legislation.<br />
Congressional Republicans emerged late last month from a retreat aimed at constructing an agreement on how to replace the ACA&nbsp;with little new clarity on the details. No precise plan came out of the meeting because “we are still developing what this thing is going to look like,” Sen. Jim Risch, R-Idaho, told reporters. Republicans adopted a budget resolution for the end of January and missed their target date to deliver a repeal plan.<br />
<strong>Employers expect changes to arrive gradually, if at all.</strong><br />
While many still expect significant changes to the law (eventually), employers should be taking a wait-and-see approach, and, in the meantime, continue to comply with the ACA.<br />
House Speaker Paul Ryan told reporters at the&nbsp;retreat that Republicans could “make good” later this year on devising aspects of the party’s healthcare promise and other top policies they campaigned on in 2016, such as a tax overhaul.<br />
Already, a number of steps have been taken to begin unraveling the massive healthcare law. On his first day in office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing agencies like Health and Human Services, Treasury and Labor, to utilize their authorities under the law to minimize the unwarranted economic and regulatory burdens of the ACA.<br />
“In terms of reporting requirements, I think employers and employer plans need to continue business as usual,” Steve Wojcik, vice president of public policy at the National Business Group on Health, said of the order.<br />
<strong>We can help!</strong> If you have questions regarding the Affordable Care Act, and its changes as they are introduced and unfold, we are always happy to have a consultative discussion. Feel free to call us today at <strong>1-800-250-2741 ext.170</strong>, or email us at <a href="mailto:%20solutions@gsanational.com">solutions@gsanational.com</a>. You may also post questions below. Our blog is moderated by ACA subject matter specialists who will reply to questions within 24 hours.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/employers-urged-continue-aca-compliance-efforts/">Employers Urged To Continue ACA Compliance Efforts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gsanational.com">GSA National</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gsanational.com/employers-urged-continue-aca-compliance-efforts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Department of Labor Releases Workplace Wellness Programs Research Report</title>
		<link>https://www.gsanational.com/department-of-labor-releases-workplace-wellness-programs-research-report/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gsanational.com/department-of-labor-releases-workplace-wellness-programs-research-report/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wpengine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2015 16:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOL Audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gsanational.com/?p=459</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) recently published a&#160;report on Workplace Wellness Programs, an analysis of services offered, participation and incentives. Click here for the full report. The report focuses...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/department-of-labor-releases-workplace-wellness-programs-research-report/">Department of Labor Releases Workplace Wellness Programs Research Report</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gsanational.com">GSA National</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) recently published a&nbsp;report on Workplace Wellness Programs, an analysis of services offered, participation and incentives. <a href="http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/pdf/WellnessStudyFinal.pdf">Click here for the full report</a>.<br />
The report focuses two sets of data:<br />
<strong>Analysis of Employer Survey</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Which Employer Characteristics Predict Program Availability and Use of Incentives?</li>
<li>&nbsp;How Are Wellness Programs Configured?</li>
<li>Are Incentives Increasing Program Uptake?</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Analysis of Wellness Program</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>What Employee Characteristics Predict Employee Uptake of Programs?</li>
<li>How Do Incentives Alter an Employee’s Decision to (or Not to) Participate?</li>
<li>Do Health Care Utilization Patterns Change Following Program Participation?</li>
<li>Is There a Differential Effect of Various Programs on Medical Costs?</li>
<li>Is There a Dose-Response Effect on Medical Costs in the Intensity of Program Interventions?</li>
<li>Is There Evidence that Program Participation May Create Long-Term Gains in Health?</li>
</ul>
<p>If you have questions about this report, please contact us at <strong>1-800-250-2741</strong> or <a href="mailto: solutions@gsanational.com">solutions@gsanational.com</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/department-of-labor-releases-workplace-wellness-programs-research-report/">Department of Labor Releases Workplace Wellness Programs Research Report</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gsanational.com">GSA National</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gsanational.com/department-of-labor-releases-workplace-wellness-programs-research-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS Issues Regulations Regarding Affordable Care Act Reporting Requirements</title>
		<link>https://www.gsanational.com/irs-issues-regulations-regarding-affordable-care-act-reporting-requirements/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gsanational.com/irs-issues-regulations-regarding-affordable-care-act-reporting-requirements/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wpengine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 17:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare and Welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Play or Pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gsanational.com/?p=135</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Affordable Care Act established two new IRS reporting requirements regarding group health coverage offered to employees. Each new reporting rule requires a detailed report to be filed each year...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/irs-issues-regulations-regarding-affordable-care-act-reporting-requirements/">IRS Issues Regulations Regarding Affordable Care Act Reporting Requirements</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gsanational.com">GSA National</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/ppaca-overview">Affordable Care Act</a> established two new IRS reporting requirements regarding group health coverage offered to employees. Each new reporting rule requires a detailed report to be filed each year with the IRS, and a corresponding statement provided to ‎each covered employee. One of the reporting obligations applies to all group health plans, including small employer plans (the &#8220;all group health plan&#8221;). The other reporting obligation applies to large employer plans (the&nbsp;&#8220;large employer plan&#8221;).<br />
The &#8220;all group health plans&#8221; reporting obligation is codified in Section 6055 of the Internal Revenue ‎Code (the &#8220;Code&#8221;). Its purpose is to assist the IRS and covered employees to determine ‎whether the employee and covered dependents have enrolled in a plan that provides minimum ‎essential coverage so as to avoid the ACA individual mandate penalty.‎<br />
The reporting required of applicable large employers, codified in Code Section 6056, will provide the IRS with the information that it needs to establish whether the employer has satisfied the employer responsibility ‎‎mandate so as to avoid the &#8220;play-or-pay&#8221; <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/play-or-pay-penalty-provisions">penalties</a>.‎<br />
On March 5, 2014, the IRS issued final regulations pertaining to the ACA reporting ‎requirements. The regulations are as follows:‎<br />
<strong>When do the ACA reporting rules become effective?‎</strong><br />
The new reporting is made on a calendar year basis. The reporting rules apply to the 2015 calendar year‎‎.<br />
<strong>What do the reporting rules involve?‎</strong><br />
In regard to both the &#8220;all group health plan&#8221; and &#8220;large employer only&#8221; reporting obligations, a report containing ‎information prescribed in the regulations (discussed below) must be filed each year with the IRS. In addition, a corresponding ‎statement containing individualized information must be provided to each employee covered under the plan.‎<br />
The statements to employees must be provided by January 31 following the end of the ‎applicable calendar year. Therefore, the first sets of statements (for 2015) are required to be ‎provided to employees by February 1, 2016 (January 31, 2016, being a Sunday).‎<br />
The reports to the IRS must be submitted by the last day of February following the calendar ‎year at issue, or by March 31 if the reports are filed electronically. The reports must be filed ‎electronically if more than 250 statements regarding individuals are submitted in connection with ‎the filing.‎<br />
<strong>Who is responsible for filing reports and providing the employee statements?‎</strong><br />
It depends on the particular report.<br />
For purposes of the Code Section 6055 &#8220;all group health plan&#8221; report, if the health coverage at issue is provided under an insured plan, then the insurer must ‎file the report with the IRS and provide the statements to employees.<br />
If the plan is self-insured, then the employer is responsible for the reports and statements.<br />
For purposes of the Code Section 6056 &#8220;applicable large employer only&#8221; report, ‎each employer is required to file the IRS reports and provide the employee ‎statements, regardless of whether the coverage is provided under an insured plan.‎<br />
<strong>What are the penalties for noncompliance?‎</strong><br />
An employer that fails to file the required report to the IRS and to timely provide the statements to ‎employees will be subject to a penalty of $100 per statement, up to $1,500,000.‎</p>
<h3 class="textRed">Code Section 6055 (&#8220;All Group Health Plan&#8221;) Reporting</h3>
<p><strong>What information must be reported to the IRS under the Code Section 6055 rule?‎</strong><br />
The annual Code Section 6055 report to be filed with the IRS must include the following information:</p>
<ul>
<li>The name, address, and employer identification‎ number (&#8220;EIN&#8221;) of the employer;</li>
<li>‎The name, address, and tax identification number‎ ‎(&#8220;TIN&#8221;) (or date of birth if a TIN is not available) of each employee (including any retiree or employee on COBRA) with respect to whom coverage is provided;‎</li>
<li>‎The name and TIN (or date of birth if a TIN is not‎ available) of each individual who is covered under the plan;</li>
<li>‎For each covered individual (employee and dependents), the months for which, the individual was enrolled in coverage and entitled to receive benefits; and</li>
<li>Any other information required by the instructions to the transmittal form or future guidance.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Which employees must receive the annual statement?</strong><br />
The Code Section 6055 statement must be provided to each employee who is enrolled in the plan at some point during the year. This includes covered employees who died during the year.<br />
A statement is not required to be provided to employees who were offered coverage, but who did not enroll in the plan.<br />
<strong>What information must be included in the statement to employees?‎</strong><br />
The same information outlined two questions above must be provided to each enrolled employee.</p>
<h3 class="textRed">Code Section 6056 (&#8220;Applicable Large Employer Only&#8221;) Reporting</h3>
<p><strong>What are the Code Section 6056 reporting requirements?‎</strong><br />
Applicable large employers are required to file an information return with the IRS that reports the scope of the employer-sponsored health plan coverage offered to full-time employees for the applicable year.‎<br />
The IRS and employees will use the information provided on the Code Section 6056 report and the employee statement to determine whether an employee is eligible for a premium tax credit.‎<br />
<strong>Which employees are included in the report and required to be provided statements?</strong><br />
The Code Section 6056 report will cover, and a statement will need to be provided to, each employee who is deemed to be a full-time employee under the <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/play-or-pay">play-or-pay</a> rules for any part of the year. Consequently, the reporting and furnishing of statements will be required even for full-time employees who declined to enroll in the plan.<br />
<strong>The IRS has deferred until 2016 the application of the ACA &#8220;<a href="https://www.gsanational.com/play-or-pay">play-or pay</a>&#8221; rules to applicable large employers ‎having between 50 and 99 full-time equivalent employees. Does this transition relief also ‎postpone the reporting obligation of a mid-size employer that is eligible for the play-or-pay deferral?‎</strong><br />
No, it does not. Even though a mid-size employer is exempt from the play-or-pay penalty rules ‎for 2015, a plan that is sponsored by the employer remains subject to the IRS reporting and employee statement ‎obligations for that year.‎<br />
<strong>What information must be included in the report?‎</strong><br />
Subject to certain alternative reporting methods discussed below, the annual Code Section 6056 report for an applicable large employer must include the information described below (plus any additional information required by future guidance,‎ forms, and instructions).<br />
<strong>A</strong>. Full Disclosure Information<br />
The annual report must provide the following information in full:</p>
<ul>
<li>‎The name, address, and EIN of the employer;</li>
<li>The calendar‎ year for which the information is reported;‎</li>
<li>The name and telephone number of the employer&#8217;s contact person;‎</li>
<li>A certification of whether the employer offers its full-time employees‎ ‎(and their dependents) the opportunity to enroll in‎ minimum essential coverage, by calendar month;‎</li>
<li>The months during the calendar year for which minimum essential coverage under the plan was available;</li>
<li>Each full-time employee&#8217;s share of the lowest cost monthly premium (self-only) for coverage providing minimum value offered to that full-time employee under the plan, by calendar month;</li>
<li>The number of full-time employees for each month during the calendar year; and</li>
<li>The name, address, and TIN of each full-time employee during the calendar year and the months, if any, during which the employee was covered under the plan.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>B</strong>. Information Via Indicator Code<br />
The following information will be required to be reported via an indicator code:</p>
<ul>
<li>Whether the coverage offered to‎ full-time employees and their dependents under an employer-sponsored plan provides minimum value;</li>
<li>Whether the employee had the opportunity to enroll his or her spouse in the coverage;‎</li>
<li>The total number of employees, by calendar month;‎</li>
<li>Whether an employee&#8217;s effective date of coverage‎ was affected by a permissible waiting period, by calendar month;‎</li>
<li>Whether the employer had, or did not have, any employees who were credited with any hours of service during any particular month, by calendar month;‎</li>
<li>Whether the employer is a‎ member of a &#8220;controlled group of companies,&#8221; and, if so, the name and EIN of each member of the controlled group on any day of the calendar year for which the information is reported;‎</li>
<li>If an employer is a contributing employer to a collectively-bargained multiemployer plan, whether, with respect to a full-time employee, the employer is&nbsp;not&nbsp;subject to payment of an employer penalty by reason of the employer having made contributions to the multiemployer plan; and</li>
<li>If a third party is reporting on behalf of an employer, the name,‎ address, and EIN of the third party.‎</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>C</strong>. Anticipated Additional Information<br />
The IRS has indicated that it anticipates that the additional information below will also be required to be reported for each full-time employee for each calendar month using a code.</p>
<ul>
<li>Whether coverage meeting minimum value was offered to:
<ul>
<li>The employee only;</li>
<li>The employee and the employee&#8217;s dependents only;</li>
<li>The employee and the employee&#8217;s spouse only; or</li>
<li>The employee, the employee&#8217;s spouse, and dependents.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Coverage was not offered to the employee:
<ul>
<li>But the failure to offer coverage will not result in a play-or-pay penalty (for example, because the employee was in a waiting period);</li>
<li>The employee was not a full-time employee;</li>
<li>&nbsp;The employee was not employed by the employer during that month; or</li>
<li>&nbsp;No exception applies.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Coverage was offered to the employee for the month, although the employee was not a full-time employee for that month.</li>
<li>The employee was covered under the plan.</li>
<li>The employer met one of the &#8220;affordability safe harbors&#8221; with respect to the employee.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>What information must be included in the employee statement?‎</strong><br />
The statement to full-time employees must include:</p>
<ul>
<li>All of the information included in the IRS report (see Q-11 above) that pertains to the full-time employee; and</li>
<li>The name, address, and contact information of the employer or third party that filed the report with the IRS.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>What reporting is required of members of a controlled group?</strong><br />
All employers that are part of a controlled group of companies are combined for purposes of determining the &#8220;large employer status&#8221; of the group. If the group is determined to be an applicable large employer on an aggregated basis, each individual employer in the controlled group is required under Code Section 6056 to separately report for its employees. In addition, each employer must furnish an employee statement to its own employees.‎<br />
<strong>May an employer-member use a third party to assist in completing the IRS reports?‎</strong><br />
Yes. However, engaging a third party does not transfer any responsibility from the employer for ‎the failure to file the reports or provide the statements. It is expected that the IRS will issue ‎supplemental guidance as to the manner in which a third party may assist in the reporting ‎process.‎<br />
Alternative Methods for Section ‎6056 Reporting‎<br />
In certain circumstances, the final regulations permit the use of optional, alternative reporting methods. These alternate reporting methods are described below.‎<br />
<strong>Reporting based on certification of &#8220;qualifying offers.&#8221;</strong><br />
An applicable large employer will be entitled to prepare a simplified Code Section 6056‎ report and provide a simplified employee statement with respect to each full-time employee for whom it made a &#8220;qualifying offer.&#8221; A &#8220;qualifying offer&#8221; is one that:</p>
<ul>
<li>Offers employee-only coverage providing‎ minimum value at an employee cost not exceeding 9.5% of the federal poverty line for a single individual; and</li>
<li>‎Allows the enrollment of the‎ employee&#8217;s spouse and dependents.‎</li>
</ul>
<p>For 2014, the federal poverty level for a single individual is $11,670. If that amount stays the same (which is not likely), then in order to have a qualifying offer, the cost to an employee for employee-only coverage cannot exceed $92.39 per month (9.5% of $11,670 ÷ 12).<br />
If an employee had a qualifying offer for all 12 months of the calendar year, the employer would only need to include in its annual report the employee&#8217;s name, Social Security number, address, and an indicator that a qualifying offer was made. The employer could then simply provide the employee with either a copy of the IRS report, or a general statement informing the employee that the employee, and the employee&#8217;s spouse and dependents (if any), are generally ineligible for a premium tax credit for all 12 months.‎<br />
If an employee received a qualifying offer for fewer than 12 months of the calendar year, the employer must use the general reporting and statements methods for the months in which the qualifying offer was made.<br />
Certification of the qualifying offer will be required.<br />
<strong>2015-only alternative method based qualifying offers:</strong><br />
Only for 2015, an employer certifying that it has made qualifying offers to at least 95% of its full-time employees will be eligible to use an even simpler alternative reporting method. It is anticipated that the employer will only need to report the employee&#8217;s name, address, and Social Security number, and the months for which the qualifying offer was made. Further guidance is to be provided.<br />
<strong>Option to report without separate identification‎ of full-time employees if certain conditions related to offers of coverage are satisfied.</strong><br />
The final regulations allow an employer to provide Section 6056 reporting without determining whether each employee offered coverage is a full-time employee, and without specifying the number of the employer&#8217;s full-time employees. For this option to apply, the employer must certify on its transmittal form that it offered affordable coverage to at least 98% of the employees on whom it reports in its Code Section 6056 return (which may include part-time employees).‎ This option relieves the employer from having to determine which covered employees are full-time for each month.<br />
For further information or questions regarding these updated ACA reporting requirements, please contact the us at<strong>800.250.2741</strong> or email <a href="mailto:solutions@gsanational.com">solutions@gsanational.com</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/irs-issues-regulations-regarding-affordable-care-act-reporting-requirements/">IRS Issues Regulations Regarding Affordable Care Act Reporting Requirements</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gsanational.com">GSA National</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gsanational.com/irs-issues-regulations-regarding-affordable-care-act-reporting-requirements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transitional Reinsurance Fees To Begin in 2014</title>
		<link>https://www.gsanational.com/transitional-reinsurance-fees-to-begin-in-2014/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gsanational.com/transitional-reinsurance-fees-to-begin-in-2014/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wpengine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 16:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gsanational.com/?p=473</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>One of the components of the ACA that will come into play this calendar year is the transitional reinsurance program. The purpose of the program is to help stabilize premiums...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/transitional-reinsurance-fees-to-begin-in-2014/">Transitional Reinsurance Fees To Begin in 2014</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gsanational.com">GSA National</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the components of the ACA that will come into play this calendar year is the transitional reinsurance program. The purpose of the program is to help stabilize premiums for coverage in the individual market from 2014 through 2016. In brief, the program provides for collection of $25 billion in fees from health insurers and self-insured group health plans over the course of those three years. The funds will then be used to reimburse insurers issuing policies through the insurance exchanges that cover a disproportionate level of high-cost individuals.<br />
The annual Reinsurance Assessment Fee breaks down as follows:</p>
<ul>
<li>The 2014 fee is $63 per covered life, with scheduled collection in two installments: $52.50 in January, 2015, and $10.50 in the fourth quarter of 2015.</li>
<li>The 2015 fee is confirmed at $44 per person.</li>
<li>The fee for 2016 has not yet been announced.</li>
</ul>
<p>In contrast to the comparative effectiveness fee payment rules, third-party administrators may make the transitional reinsurance fee payments on behalf of a self-insured plan. Also in contrast to the comparative effectiveness fee payment rules, the transitional reinsurance fees may be paid from plan assets, including Trust assets.<br />
If you have questions regarding the payment calculation methodology of this fee, feel free to contact us at<a href="mailto: solutions@gsanational.com">solutions@gsanational.com</a>, or <strong>1.800.250.2741</strong>.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/transitional-reinsurance-fees-to-begin-in-2014/">Transitional Reinsurance Fees To Begin in 2014</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gsanational.com">GSA National</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gsanational.com/transitional-reinsurance-fees-to-begin-in-2014/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Insurance Mandate Delayed For Medium-Sized Employers</title>
		<link>https://www.gsanational.com/health-insurance-mandate-delayed-for-medium-sized-employers/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gsanational.com/health-insurance-mandate-delayed-for-medium-sized-employers/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wpengine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gsanational.com/?p=475</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Obama Administration delays health insurance mandate for medium-sized employers For the second time since last year, the White House is giving certain employers a grace period before they must offer...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/health-insurance-mandate-delayed-for-medium-sized-employers/">Health Insurance Mandate Delayed For Medium-Sized Employers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gsanational.com">GSA National</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Obama Administration delays health insurance mandate for medium-sized employers</h3>
<p>For the second time since last year, the White House is giving certain employers a grace period before they must offer health insurance to almost all their full-time workers.<br />
Under the new rules announced this week, medium-sized employers (50 to 99 employees) will be given until 2016 before they must offer health insurance to their full-time employees.<br />
While no such moratorium has been announced for large employers with 100+ employees, they too will be given a different kind of one-year grace period. Instead of being required to offer coverage to 95 percent of full-time workers in 2015, these larger employers can avoid penalties by offering insurance to 70 percent of them next year.<br />
As the Affordable Care Act and the mandates surrounding it continue to change and unfold, we welcome you to&nbsp;contact us with questions on how it might effect your PPACA compliance efforts, call us at <strong>1.800.250.2741</strong> or email<a href="mailto: solutions@gsanational.com">solutions@gsanational.com</a>. Or, post your questions below and our subject matter specialists will respond.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/health-insurance-mandate-delayed-for-medium-sized-employers/">Health Insurance Mandate Delayed For Medium-Sized Employers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gsanational.com">GSA National</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gsanational.com/health-insurance-mandate-delayed-for-medium-sized-employers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guidance for Healthcare Exchange/Marketplace Notices</title>
		<link>https://www.gsanational.com/guidance-for-healthcare-exchangemarketplace-notices/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gsanational.com/guidance-for-healthcare-exchangemarketplace-notices/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wpengine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Marketplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gsanational.com/?p=479</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>DOL Issues Formal Guidance for the Employee Notice of Coverage Options Perhaps one of the most important elements of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) — the Health Insurance Exchange/Marketplace —...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/guidance-for-healthcare-exchangemarketplace-notices/">Guidance for Healthcare Exchange/Marketplace Notices</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gsanational.com">GSA National</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>DOL Issues Formal Guidance for the Employee Notice of Coverage Options</h3>
<p>Perhaps one of the most important elements of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) — the Health Insurance Exchange/Marketplace — will become available to individuals starting on January 1, 2014. The Department of Labor (DOL) requires employers to issue Marketplace Notices to existing employees by October 1, 2013. New employees hired on or after October 1, 2013, must be provided with a copy of the Marketplace Notice within 14 days of the date of hire.<br />
All employers, including those that do not sponsor a group health plan, must provide a form of the marketplace notice to ALL of their employees – including those who are not eligible for employer-sponsored group health plan coverage.<br />
Below are some answers to some of the frequently asked questions we’ve received regarding the Marketplace Notice.<br />
<strong>Who do we send the Marketplace Notice to?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>All employees must receive the Marketplace Notice, regardless of whether they are eligible to participate in the health plan (i.e., part-time employees) and regardless of whether they are enrolled in the plan.</li>
<li>Separate Marketplace Notices are not required to be sent to spouses or dependent children.</li>
<li>Marketplace Notices are not required to be sent to former employees, regardless of whether they are still covered by or eligible for coverage under the plan (i.e., COBRA coverage).</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>How do we deliver the Marketplace Notice?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The Marketplace Notice may sent by first-class mail.</li>
<li>Marketplace Notices may be delivered by e-mail to those employees who access e-mail as an integral part of their duties.</li>
<li>Guidance does not state that the Marketplace Notice must be included in a new hire package but we advise that this is an acceptable method of delivery for new hires.</li>
</ul>
<p>DOL has posted a <a href="http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/pdf/FLSAwithplans.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">sample notice</a>, which serves as a useful example of what employers will be expected to share with their employees. DOL also has released a <a href="http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/pdf/FLSAwithoutplans.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">form for employers who do not offer coverage</a>.<br />
Employers can begin using these forms, or create their own modified version, as long as the notice meets the DOL&#8217;s<a href="http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/newsroom/tr13-02.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">notification requirements</a>.<br />
If you have questions regarding these notifications or require assistance in issuing compliant notifications to your employees, call us at <strong>1.800.250.2741</strong> or email <a href="mailto: solutions@gsanational.com">solutions@gsanational.com</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/guidance-for-healthcare-exchangemarketplace-notices/">Guidance for Healthcare Exchange/Marketplace Notices</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gsanational.com">GSA National</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gsanational.com/guidance-for-healthcare-exchangemarketplace-notices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS Issues Final Rule on Individual Mandate</title>
		<link>https://www.gsanational.com/irs-issues-final-rule-on-individual-mandate/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gsanational.com/irs-issues-final-rule-on-individual-mandate/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wpengine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 17:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Marketplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPACA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gsanational.com/?p=483</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Details for Final Regulations of Individual Mandate Published The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has issued final rules on Tuesday for the individual mandate provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/irs-issues-final-rule-on-individual-mandate/">IRS Issues Final Rule on Individual Mandate</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gsanational.com">GSA National</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Details for Final Regulations of Individual Mandate Published</h3>
<p>The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has issued final rules on Tuesday for the individual mandate provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).<br />
The requirement, a centerpiece of the Affordable Care Act, requires most individuals to have minimum essential coverage in 2014 or pay a penalty.&nbsp;If individuals choose not to carry insurance, they are subject to a penalty, starting at $95 per person per year or 1 percent of income in 2014, whichever is greater, and eventually reaching $695 per person or 2.5 percent of income by 2016.<br />
The first penalties will be due when individuals file their 2014 tax returns in 2015. The annual penalties for 2014 through 2016 are as follows:</p>
<ul>
<li>2014: Greater of $95 per adult and $47.50 per child under age 18 ($285 maximum per family), or 1% of income over the tax-filing threshold</li>
<li>2015: Greater of $325 per adult and $162.50 per child under age 18 ($975&nbsp;maximum per family),&nbsp;or 2% over the tax-filing threshold</li>
<li>2016: Greater of $695 per adult and $347.50 per child under age 18 ($2,085&nbsp;maximum per family),&nbsp;or 2.5% over the tax-filing threshold</li>
</ul>
<p>The individual mandate is distinct from the employer mandate, which imposes a fee on most large employers that do not offer a minimum level of coverage. The Administration delayed that provision, putting off the effective date until 2015.<br />
If you have questions about these changes, call us at <strong>1.800.250.2741</strong> or email <a href="mailto: solutions@gsanational.com">solutions@gsanational.com</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gsanational.com/irs-issues-final-rule-on-individual-mandate/">IRS Issues Final Rule on Individual Mandate</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gsanational.com">GSA National</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gsanational.com/irs-issues-final-rule-on-individual-mandate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
